Transformer PF Compensation – Load & No-load Condition

Transformer PF Compensation – Load & No-load Condition
Updated: | 6 min read

Technical Articles

Table of Contents

Click on any topic to jump to that section

Transformer Compensation

With increased emphasis on power quality and significant incentives / penalties associated with power factor improvement, most customers try to operate their plant electrical system at near unity power factor.


In order to achieve this, all sources of reactive power need to be identified and fully compensated. One such element that consumes reactive power is the transformer. Reactive power is consumed by transformers through the no load magnetizing current and through the leakage reactance. This article is aimed at helping customers size capacitor banks for transformer compensation during Load & No-load conditions.

Basics

The power factor on the HT side (source side) of a transformer depends upon the following:

  • LT Side (Load side) power factor
  • Real power consumed by transformer
  • Reactive power consumed by transformer


The load side power factor is compensated by employing APFC panels and/or by providing individual compensation to connected loads. Transformer compensation on the other hand needs a different approach.


The equivalent circuit of a transformer is as shown below

Routine Test Certificate

Where: VP is the source voltage, VS is the load voltage, IO is the no load current, IW is the no load watt Loss current, IM is the magnetizing current, RNL is the no load resistance, Lmag is the magnetizing inductance, Lleakage is the leakage inductance, RT is the winding resistance. T As can be seen from the equivalent circuit, the inductive elements, namely Lmag and Lleakage contribute to the VAR consumption of the transformer

Magnetizing kVAr Requirement of a Transformer

The magnetizing kVAr consumption is a function of the rated voltage and the magnetizing current of the transformer. The no load current of a transformer varies between 0.5 % and 2.5% of the full load current depending on the design of the transformer and the operating flux level. The magnetizing current is around 80% of the no load current and thus varies between 0.4% and 2%. It is safe to assume a value of 1-1.2% for distribution transformers. Thus, the kVAr required to compensate for the magnetizing current of the transformer is around 1- 1.2% of the transformer kVA rating. 

kVAr Requirement due to Leakage Reactance

The kVAr requirement due to leakage reactance is a function of the square of the current and the leakage reactance. At full load the voltage drop across the leakage reactance is equal to the impedance voltage (%Z impedance). The reactive kVAr consumption is equal to the product of impedance voltage and load current.


Qx = IL2 × Xleakage


Where IL is the load current and Xleakage is the leakage reactance; QX is the kVAr


Power Requirement

Typically, for a 3-phase transformer,

Xleakage = V2 2kVA × (%Z);


Where V2 is the secondary voltage.


Qx = (%Z) × (kVA) × (%load)2

%Loading is assumed to be 50% to 75%. Thus for % Z=5%, QX works out to 5% × (75%)2 i.e. 3%.


Thus, the kVAr requirement to compensate for the leakage reactance of the transformer is around 3% of the kVA rating of the transformer. The total kVAr required to compensate for the reactive power consumed by the transformer is around 4% to 4.25% of the kVA rating of the transformer

How much reactive power, a transformer would consume under no-load / fractional load conditions?

During no-load/fractional load conditions, reactive power consumption by transformer is contributed by magnetizing branch in the circuit shown in fig 1. Approximately the reactive power consumed by the distribution transformer would be around 1.2% of the power rating (kVA).

What would be the impact on electricity bill?

Let us assume 1000 kVA transformer operating at fractional load. As per above data, the magnetizing kVAr consumed by transformer would be 12 kVAr (1.2% of 1000 kVA). Let us assume 5 kW as active power is consumed.


At this condition below would be the HT meter readings:

Active power consumed (kW) = 5 kW

Reactive power consumed (kVAr lag) = 12 kVAr

Apparent power (kVA) = √ (52+122) = 13 kVA

Power Factor = kW ÷ kVA = 0.385


Let us calculate expected energy bill, with assumption of Rs. 7 per unit. Other fixed charges are not considered for the sake of simplicity. 

In kWh billing state (like Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, etc.)

Active energy (kWh) per month = 5 kW x 24 x 30 = 3600 units.

PF penalty is typically 2% active energy charges for every reduction of 0.01 in PF from 0.9. In the above case, the energy charges (kWh) will be Rs. 25200 and PF penalty would be Rs. 25975 per month.

Total bill value based on kWh + PF penalty will be Rs. 51175.

By compensating for transformer kVAr, the same bill can be reduced up to Rs. 25200. 

In kVAh billing state (like Maharashtra, Haryana, etc.)

kVAh consumed per month = 13 kVA x 24 x 30 = 9360 units! The electricity bill based on kVAh would be Rs. 65520 per month.

By compensating for transformer kVAr, the same bill can be reduced up to Rs. 25200.

What is the solution for this?

Capacitors need to be added at the LT side of the transformer and always remain in circuit (call as Fixed Capacitors). Some consumers are aware of this issue and have provided some fixed capacitors as solution. But many are not aware of this serious issue and end up paying hefty penalty. Capacitor rating for no-load transformer compensation can be calculated as:


Capacitor kVAr = 1.2% of Transformer kVA rating


These are the minimum required capacitor value to improve PF to healthier levels during no-load conditions. It may not be possible to achieve exact unity power factor, but enough to reduce electricity bill due to very low PF. When the transformer loading increases, the capacitor required for transformer compensation also increases. Capacitor kVAr rating can go up to 5% of transformer kVA rating, depending upon transformer loading and its impedance value.

Transformer rating (kVA)Fixed Capacitor (kVAr)
250 3.0
500 6.0
630 7.5
1000 12.0
1250 15.0
1600 25.0
2000 25.0
2500 30.0

Alternate long-term solution

Latest APFC controllers can sense in the HT side of the transformer (typically 110 V PTs and CTs), give feedback to the APFC panel in the LT side and do the compensation. As the sensing location is very close to EB metering point, accurate PF compensation can be achieved by this alternative method. Transformer reactive power compensation is also included in this type of sensing. Sometimes fixed capacitors can result in leading PF and the method of HT sensing is better. Hence it can be thought as permanent long-term solution.

About the Author

author

Sourav Dasmodak,

Product Management & Marketing (Powergear - ACB)

Product Owner of Air Circuit Breaker (ACB) of Lauritz Knudsen for Domestic & International Market. I can talk to you about Electrical Products' Sales, Business Development, Market Expansion, Cracking Critical Strategic Account, handling Key Account & of course how to develop & motivate Channels along with the organizational growth. Having near about one and a half decade of experience across the country with major electrical manufacturers (Top 4).

Assistance Required?

Select an option to Contact Us

contact-sales
Contact Sales
product-sales
Contact Support